Trump Administration Goes on Union-Busting Spree

From UE News | Photo Courtesy of ueunion.org | UE News Reuse Policy

While former President Biden’s claim to have been “the most pro-union President in history” is certainly debatable, President Trump is on track to become the most anti-union President in history in his second term.

In his first three months in office, Trump has signed executive orders which seek to cancel collective bargaining agreements covering over one million federal workers. Although justified with reference to “national security,” the executive orders target workers across the federal government, in agencies as disparate as Veterans Affairs, the Treasury and Energy Departments, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Health and Human Services.

The executive orders seek to not only overturn existing union contracts, but strip workers’ right to be represented by a union at all. They also instruct government agencies to stop deducting union dues from members’ paychecks. Since Trump was inaugurated, the largest federal government workers’ union, the American Federation of Government Employees, has seen its membership surge by tens of thousands of members.

As veteran labor reporter Steven Greenhouse pointed out in a recent article in The Guardian, Trump’s “aggressive wave of anti-union actions is already spurring some [private-sector] US employers to take a more hostile stance toward unions.”

Private-sector employers who wish to take advantage of the current moment to attack or weaken their workers’ unions will find it easier to do so since Trump fired National Labor Relations Board member Gwynne Wilcox in January, leaving the Board unable to issue decisions. Following another executive order, the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) shut down the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service in March.

On April 3, an anti-union trade association asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to “invalidate fifteen NLRB cases that were decided during the Biden administration.” As analyst Matt Bruenig writes at NLRB Edge:

This sort of thing has never happened before. The NLRB is an independent agency and the AG has no statutory role in how it operates. Such a move by the AG would be illegal under prevailing understandings of administrative law, but of course Trump and the conservative legal movement are seeking to have the Supreme Court invalidate a large swath of administrative law on the theory that it unconstitutionally restricts the power of the president.

An even more disturbing and bizarre attack on the ability of the NLRB to protect workers’ rights was revealed earlier this week when a whistleblower from the NLRB’s information technology department revealed to Congress and NPR that operatives from DOGE likely removed around 10 gigabytes of sensitive information from the Board’s case management system.

In addition to obvious concerns about the breach of privacy (NLRB case data includes sensitive personal information such as social security numbers and home addresses, as well as proprietary corporate information), if employers got ahold of this data, it would make it easier for them to fire — and blacklist — active union members.

Of particular concern is that DOGE is headed by billionaire Elon Musk, whose company SpaceX has been the subject of NLRB complaints filed by its workers, and who has shown himself to be rabidly anti-union.